Search results for "international investment law"
showing 4 items of 4 documents
Investment Arbitration and the Controverted Right of the Arbitrator to Issue a Separate or Dissenting Opinion
2018
Abstract Although dissents are not generally encouraged in international arbitration, they are a reality of investment treaty disputes. About one in five cases includes at least one separate or dissenting opinion. The ICSID Convention is rare among investment arbitration rules to expressly recognise the right of the arbitrator to attach his or her personal opinion to the award. Other investment arbitration rules are silent on the topic. And yet dissenting opinions are an established feature of several international courts and tribunals and their role is often viewed more benevolently than in investment arbitration. The article explores the perceived advantages and disadvantages of dissents …
International Investment Law and the Tangible and Intangible Aspects of Cultural Heritage: Substantive Discipline and Dispute Settlement Interactions
The relationship between international investment law and cultural heritage has commanded little attention and only recently. Certainly, international investment law has become one of the most prominent branches of international law. Its development has been strictly connected to the soaring growth of bilateral treaties on the promotion and protection of foreign investment and free trade agreements with foreign investment chapters. n turn, the status and place of cultural heritage under international law has grown, significantly progressing from some provisions included in international humanitarian conventions on the protection of heritage during armed conflicts. In light of the few studie…
Economic Crises, Sovereign Debt Restructurings and the Shifting Landscape of International Investment Law
2016
International audience
Diskriminācijas aizlieguma saturs starptautiskajos investīciju strīdos
2019
Diskriminācijas aizliegums ir viens no pamatprincipiem starptautisko investīciju tiesībās un starptautisko investīciju aizsardzības režīmos. Lai gan šis princips ir sastopams gandrīz ikkatrā investīciju aizsardzības režīmu nodibinošajā dokumentā, tā definīcija un saturs joprojām ir neskaidri, izraisot diskusijas starptautiskajā sabiedrībā. Principa interpretācija ir atstāta tiesu un šķīrējtiesu ziņā, kas nav spējušas nonākt pie vienota un skaidra diskriminācijas aizlieguma satura. Šī darba mērķis ir noskaidrot līdzīgās iezīmes principa definēšanā un piemērošanā, ko ir izvirzījušas tiesas un šķīrējtiesas risinot starptautiskos investīciju strīdus, tādējādi definējot diskriminācijas aizliegum…